Tuesday, May 7, 2013

Christina in Reminiscence

The journey experience was quite subtle and turned out quite amazing in retrospect. First it is the learning of high collaboration in utilizing the win-win negotiation approach. Then, it is the major project of engaging in virtual collaboration used in a project setting. Overall, I think it was self-discovery and self-motivated learning which created the most learning impact for me personally.


Introduction – Learning by Observation -> Reflection -> Action




For me, I think in this high collaboration course, the greatest inspiration is learning from example of others (Observation-> Reflection -> Action). First, it is a collaborative approach which is demonstrated by Frank, the professor. He used an approach of discussion: both motivating and prompting method of learning. There was a lot of room for class expression, and student participation was highly activated. I see classmates literally presenting or shouting aloud their ideas and opinions and we all learned from each other’s experience and sharing. At the end of every class, we all had an opportunity to vote the best teams, which again, reinforced collaborative encouragement and appraisal. Although initially, students felt it was quite kiddy to do that, but eventually, we got into the hang of it and each team decided to vote the team which inspired and shared the best learning for the lesson. This is why I said, we learnt from each other’s example, as the voting did indeed reflect that we did listen to each other’s presentations.



 
The Approach Factor

I felt the most unique is the mode of learning. It was motivational, innovative and creative. It was not at all like the traditional, sit in class and learn all you can type learning, which either congests the brain or leave the brain dead from dullness. Rather, constantly, we were triggered to find our own answers during the lessons or the projects. Take the first project, win-win negotiation, for instance. This project basically left each team to research one’s own approach, material and ideas for presentation. Moreover, there was no right or wrong answers to the subject, very much left to be discussed and really up to the imagination of each team. At the second project of virtual collaboration, it was almost like starting learning from scratch. Even though some of us have used virtual platforms in our workplace, the difficulty of the project is due to the gaps in understanding between team members. Each one has a different version of what virtual collaboration is. Interestingly, what happened was that, one start to see the formation of collaboration during the discussions, debates and struggles. Teams commenced the project with individualistic opinions, eventually started evolving to a point of disagreement then ultimately to reach a point of mutual agreement.


This look very much like what was stated in Tuckman’s (1965) theory of team process: forming -> storming-> norming -> performing.



One virtually sees the stages formulate. This is why I mentioned that learning in this course is very self-discovery directed

 

 

 The People Factor


The teams comprise of 2, 3 persons’ teams- Team Now and Team SOS or other name Harmony and the Tie. The Tie is composed of 3 team members, all mainland Chinese. Our team, Harmony, is multi cultured, with Singaporean- Chinese, HK-Chinese and Mainland Chinese all together. The common denominator is we are all Chinese. In study of high collaborations, culture can influence on the team behavior. A team is made up of a collection of people that must rely upon group collaboration if each member is to experience the optimum of success and goal achievement. For the mainland Chinese mentality, they maintained a teacher-student, leader-follower using dogmatic leader approach. As we have 4 out of 6 mainland Chinese, the approach seemed like a one-way traffic, where challenges and debates are not very well addressed. Instead, the strife for the ‘leader’ to emerge is evident during the discussions. Till at the end of the day, Julie (the more aggressive individual) steps up to champion. This does not necessarily mean that she, therefore, is a natural leader, nor does that mean she had a strong point, it just meant who relents so as to end the strife and come to common ‘pacification’ is why the strife ended. Hence, once the stage is set as such, the leader-follower mode continues to function within the group scenario. However, this is not a long-term welcomed approach for the Singapore and HK Chinese, who believe in liberty and freedom of expression and sharing of ideas. Hence, conflict occurred in subtle but sure ways.

 

How unity was established? Unity was somehow reached by the aggressive party conforming to the soft party or vice versa. In our case was the latter. Initially, Julie was the rough tug, but as the process dug deeper, Sharon and I felt unrelenting to the ideas as it was approaching an ‘overboard’ situation. We had to call for a compromise. It took us to play a game of ‘politics’ in order to achieve a point of harmony. We took votes to see how we approach the next steps of agreement. And upon gathering majority votes, we raise united concerns against the one standalone. Of course, there was a stage of ‘tension’ when that happened, but it is inevitable. Team processes can experience stages of discomfort where edges rub. At that point, we sometimes have to push back. In our case, applying push back help relieved tension and regain team focus and objective. At the end of the project, I can say we manage to stage the show gracefully and everyone in the team could see the push back did in fact reduce the workload, and streamlined our efforts to focus on the big picture perspective for the project outcome.

The Chemistry Factor, the ‘staying together’
 
I am a strong believer of team chemistry. Although I think Tuckman’s theory have its proof, but I think one thing that could have made the process more enjoyable or the journey more pleasant will be what I call the chemistry. A soccer quote (wrote Babe Ruth) ‘The way a team plays as a whole determines its success. You may have the greatest bunch of individual stars in the world, but if they don't play together, the club won't be worth a dime.



I think if a team is made of egotistical individual stars and if they don’t get along, it will fail. They can get the project done but it won’t be a masterpiece, rather a piece of rag.  Henry Ford said it well, “Coming together is a beginning. Keeping together is progress. Working together is success.  One thing that I am happy to say is that our team not only kept together but worked together. I think that is key focus of high collaboration. As our name so rightly called ‘Harmony’, how harmony can be achieved is everyone playing a note exclusive but not independent of the other. To arrive at harmony is to pitch to a blend with the rest of the team, that which is often known as ‘fine tuning’. Throughout the collaboration process of project work, discussions, and preparation, our team was constantly fine tuning with each other. To reach at a beautiful harmony is when the project is completed and the presentation came out beautifully orchestrated.



The Endurance Factor – ‘Objective’ in mind




Objective is what drives the team where it goes.  If the team is short of looking at the objective, it is easy to side track and derail. I think it was good that we all had a few objectives in view, 1) the objective to complete the course 2) to outdo other teams in performance 3) to get a good grade. These objectives are the driving forces for the team to stay together and to push for the finishing line. The objectives also kept each one focused and do their part diligently. Each one has somehow an inbuilt mechanism to obey the laws of success, which is to have imagination, enthusiasm, self-control, self confidence, concentration, cooperation and tolerance. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Law_of_ Suc cess, May 6, 5:17pm). And to some saying ‘endurance (tolerance) is the price tag of achievement’. The ultimate goal to get our 3 goals achieved, and whatever we do, we need to obey the laws of success in order that we can succeed. In retrospect, I think we did succeed. We gained a good appraisal for our project from Frank. That is really the aim of learning, to receive the recognition and reward at the end of the day when you have persevered to the end.

 
Conclusion:

I think in a successful collaboration, everyone in the team is a player and a winner. Without the element of trust and mutual respect, teamwork is hard to be established. The high collaboration class has established a success factor which enabled us to find the ‘fit’ to the team. Each one in the process of collaboration, worked around by breaking communication barriers, egoism, pride, and allow the team to form and formulate a team process and approach. Definitely it also meant rough edges need to be smoothened, temper need to be tamed, slackness need to be pushed and so forth. But with the objective and goal, it keeps the team moving forward and towards a common goal.


Individual Blog - Julie's Learning Journey


THE JOURNEY OF LEARNING – HIGH PERFORMANCE COLLABORATION

Julie’s Individual Blog (SID 52548177)

<<则万物>>
天地合 (萨顶顶)
When the heaven meets the sky, it is the harmony prospers the lives. So is the journey of high performance collaboration.
 I am sharing with you ALL my own perspective on the journey TEAM HARMONY made for the VIRTUAL PROJECT and the VIRTUAL COLLABORATION.

Introduction

For the group virtual project, Team TIE from morning class and Team HARMONY from evening class formed a virtual organization to build up a virtual platform for a virtual business.
 
 Each of us has different background, which you could read from our individual self-introduction in the blog. Such diversification posed challenges as well as opportunities in our virtual collaboration. Now as the journey to work as a virtual team almost concluded, I reflected in depth on three areas:

1.      Factors contributed to effective virtual Co-ordination

2.      Virtual Technology is a Double Edged Sword

3.      The positive side of conflict and personal learning to solve Conflict

Co-ordination

To effectively communicate among six people virtually, Team TIE and Team HARMONY focused on three elements:  (1) leader centric communication, (2) effective virtual meetings and (3) task oriented virtual organization.

The Journey Started With Learning Best Practice

The positive attitude to learn the best practice of virtual team communications encouraged both sides to seek the experts’ advice: the professor and the virtual organization readings assigned at class. Both teams leveraged heavily on their leaders to do most of the communication except the brainstorming stage by which weekly virtual meeting was conducted prior to Easter Holiday. Virtual meetings were planned with agenda and followed up with meeting minutes and actions required. Jobs between two teams were assigned by tasks, per the reading of managing virtual organization effectively.

The Destination - Outcome
Such investment proved to bring high returns later on in the project in regards to both time saved and effectiveness achieved. And most of the meetings ended quicker than expected due to the high effectiveness. The leverage point of two team leaders simplified the communication process and makes the co-ordination easier and smooth. Preplanned tasked focus virtual organization avoid confusions later on regarding each team’s responsibilities and deliverables.

By the time of Easter holiday, the draft of the projects was completed and there had been no confusion between the two teams on role and responsibility. After that each individual team focus on own portion with leaders touch base weekly through the phone on the progress and any latest changes, if any. No virtual meeting was scheduled due to good pre work and well planned roles and responsibilities between morning and evening team.
Here are some of the examples of the best practices we learned and applied:

(1)               Communication through leaders. Team TIE and Team HARMONY leveraged heavily their team leaders for most of the communication to simplify the communication channel and improve effectiveness.

 

Example - Email


From: julie ma [julie7_b@yahoo.com]
Sent: 25 March 2013 12:00
To: WANG Zhe; juliema7
Cc: christine; xwkong2@student.cityu.edu.hk; Sharon Chu;
qiaojchen2@student.cityu.edu.hk
Subject: inputs on draft
Thanks, Josh and the team. It captured what we discussed and I just modify a bit on the flow and add in an overall picture on the information gathering source. Then followed by twitter as an example... you can further fine tune it.
Also for the dashboard, really like it and will use that for our portion. I would recommend us to put overall resources (instead just the info from twitter, we support to gather and consolidate all the information to convert to overall resources needed)
As we are presenting on 23rd April, I change our project to 4.23
Let me know if you have any question... otherwise go ahead and fine tune it for your presentation!
Christine and Sharon will modify our portion this week as I would be out. We will catch up after the Easter Holiday!
Best regards
Julie
 
From: WANG Zhe <zwang25-c@my.cityu.edu.hk>
To: juliema7 <juliema7@163.com>; julie ma <julie7_b@yahoo.com>
Cc: christine <vis268@gmail.com>; "xwkong2@student.cityu.edu.hk" <xwkong2@student.cityu.edu.hk>; Sharon Chu <sharon1102@yahoo.com>; "qiaojchen2@student.cityu.edu.hk" <qiaojchen2@student.cityu.edu.hk>
Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2013 1:55 PM
Subject: RE: virtual meeting 3
 
Dear Julie
Please see the attachment of our draft, kindly let us know what are we missing



(2)            Effective Virtual Meetings  

Virtual Meeting
Meeting channels were simplified from six into two that each team gathered at one venue and connect with the other virtually.  Even though we may spend half an hour (first time) to fifteen minutes on setting up the virtual communication tools, the simplicity of communication channels, two instead of six, makes the meeting very efficient and we are always able to end earlier. As the rest of the teams are also in the same meeting, discussion time was assigned to each individual team to get alignment first prior to two leaders’ alignment.

Pre meeting phone calls and followed up phone calls or whatsapp after meetings between leaders further helped the coordination and keep the two virtual teams aligned on direction and progress. It also offers flexibility for any minor changes to be incorporated and allow the two teams to stay focused for the key milestones.
 Example - Whatsapp

Whatsapp on 9th April
Julie: we clarified with professor today. He said we can either focus on the virtual process or the value virtual org added to the rescue. I opted for the later as we need do that in our blogs… synergy. Let u know how we concluded on Thursday.
Josh: ok, thank you. Let us know so our group can also do our part properly.

Moreover meeting agenda and meeting minutes helped to drive the focus and effectiveness of virtual teams and enabled team members to be aligned and organized.

Example - email

From: Julie <julie7_b@yahoo.com>
To: WANG Zhe <
zwang25-c@my.cityu.edu.hk>; "xwkong2@student.cityu.edu.hk" <xwkong2@student.cityu.edu.hk>; "qiaojchen2@student.cityu.edu.hk" <qiaojchen2@student.cityu.edu.hk>
Cc: Sharon Chu <
sharon1102@yahoo.com>; christine <vis268@gmail.com>; Julie <julie7_b@yahoo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 4:36 PM
Subject: Sunday Meeting at two p.m

All,
Thanks for making our first meeting!
To better utilize our precious time, I would recommend all of us come and prepared. Pls read through the professor readings and come with your idea on our virtual project... Be creative.
Morning class pls find a room and evening class will also find a room. We will then connect through virtual meeting, using the software Christine recommended.
Joshua, pls also share with us your team hk phone number for us to stay in touch.
Everyone pls read through and send me a confirmation email to ensure all of us on the same page
Agenda
 
First half an hour
1. Self introduction and get to know each other especially the virtual side, yes the morning class and the evening class.
2. Pls share your strength briefly. We will leverage each other' s strength to work on our project.
Two thirty To three p.m
3. Topic discussion. Brainstorming.
Three to Five
4. Project flow, process and assigning jobs to each individual.
We will conclude the meeting by agreeing on future milestones.
 
As I read through the readings that virtual team works well if it is task oriented. We will do so and also build up our social emotional bondage in our first meeting.
 
Ground rules: do not be late. The last one come will buy everyone drinks at the new deliverance coffee shop in the university.
Joshua, could you help set up the wechat group again. And ensure the recommended software was installed at least on one of your computers.
 
Rgds
Julie


(3)            Task Focused Virtual Team Structure

Virtual teams were structured based upon task that Team Tie became Team Now to be in charge of demand forecast and focused on step 1 Resource Needed. Team HARMONY became Team SOS to own supply and focused on Step 2-4 that covered supply matching, logistics and execution.

After brainstorming session to align on the project concept and process, each team was set on its own journey to complete the task assigned. Only minimal exchange of progress and working powerpoint were needed. We did not meet any difficulty of aligning the job allocation with morning team as some other teams encountered. This proved that teams with a high level of task-related processes outperforming teams with a low level as Siebdrat, Hoegl and Ernst (2009) demonstrated.  
 
Virtual Technology

Virtual Technology has been proved to be a double edged sword in our virtual projects. The use of technology did facilitate the virtual teams’ work, especially the instant message through WeChat and Whatsapp. Not only team members can communicate to each other any time and have instant feedback but also group communication can be created to get everyone on the same page simultaneously. We actually have created two groups, one for both virtual teams and one for our Team HARMONY . The instant message works especially well on simple point touching base such as organizing meetings, timeline etc.

Example – WeChat:
WeChat – 22nd March
Josh (15:39 p.m) : For the concept of shopping cart, would you mind to elaborate more to us? Do we need to physically make a shopping cart application, or just a shopping cart concept which only shows from Power Point?
Julie (15:45 p.m): The later. A Graph
Josh: Ok, then my group can move on, lol. Thank you

Challenge of Virtual Technology
Instead of having the corporate dedicated IT support on virtual meetings such as bridge, video conference room etc, two teams used a free virtual meeting software called Visimeet that recommended by Christine.

It took each member to install the software but the most stressful part was that we would never be able to have 6 people on the line stably. People kept on dropping on and off the line. More than half of the time was spent to solve the technology problem when we first met virtually at home. The virtual meeting of 6 people at the same time proved to be very inefficient. We were forced to finish the meeting earlier due to technical problem that we could not get all people back to virtual meeting. This hampered the effectiveness of team work.

Moreover the disruption of team work led to a rather low morale and frustrated team members that each of us concluded that holding virtual meeting at the university is more effective and less frustrated, even taking consideration of the transportation time. Later we did hear other teams manage to host 6 people virtually at the same time, through ipad and not laptop. But we had already run out of the patience to try.

Example – Technology Challenge

Virtual Meeting on Saturday through both Visimeet and Skype failed to host five people at the same time. Teams had to agree to change back to meeting virtually at university to overcome the technology problem. Please see highlighted bold parts.

On Mar 16, 2013 9:57 PM, "julie ma" <julie7_b@yahoo.com> wrote:
        All,
Pls note that red fonts is action required. Due date is prior to next Tuesday 19th March meeting. Pls make effort to attend as that might be our last virtual brainstorming meeting :-)
16th march – 2nd virtual meeting
Meeting attendees: Josh, Michelle, Sharon, Christine and Julie.
Meeting Mins:
1. Due to the technology difficulty to have five people in the meeting, Virtual Meeting is now scheduled from 6 p.m to 7 p.m Tuesday at library group study room.
2. virtual Revise team focus to be virtual rescue. Org  (instead of virtual charity. Org)
3. Positioning is: Time is precious in rescue and Virtual Platform can facilitate time saving. More catchy sentence needed to be used for our presentation.(Action Required / AR to Christine, by next Tuesday Meeting)
4. Logistics need to be covered from very beginning when the earthquake happened. Logistics expert needs to be included to come up with resource required and transportation means. Theme is now through logistics from beginning to the end as overall framework. (AR: Christine, our logistics expert, send out logistics flow chart/process map for the virtual rescue project by Sunday. Everyone should adjust or modify own portion per the new flow)
5. Morning Team made good practice of using twitter as example of gathering information. Christine provided linkage on other social media means and Morning team need to comprehend that for Tuesday meeting.
6. We will meet from now on every Tuesday or Thursday each week, 6 p.m to 7 p.m. with Josh and Julie Synch up by phone in between.
Timeline:
19th March Framework aligned and each part allocate within team
In between I would recommend each team has its own ppt review prior to two team's meeting
25th March Review each part’s PPT (Julie will be away on 26th Tuesday, and Christine might be out for trip, we need to agree on the timeline on Tuesday meeting
Easter Holiday – One meeting to final synch up on the consolidated ppt.
Practice after that before final presentation and pls send each  other the group blog.
Pls note all meeting arrangements and 1st meeting agenda and minutes are below. - For your individual write ups
Pls let me know if you have any question and do make for the Tuesday meeting. Christine would likely be late due to her work schedule but we will cover for her as much as possible.
Best regards
Julie

What is more dangerous is that the use of virtual technology, instead of meeting face to face, did increase the risk of misunderstanding in communication, especially when it is complicated issues. While email is creating conflicts, whatsapp is even worse. One of the reasons is because few people like to type long contents on whatsapp, which is usually installed on smartphone with tiny keyboard. the shorten of sentence can easily lead to misunderstanding. 
Example:

Whatsapp Message was sent:
 “if any of you can not submit today your portion. Please assume the role of consolidator”
As it was through smartphone and the sender was on the move, an underlining message was missed – “Because I would be tied up next week and need help from you to do the consolidation”
That left to room of speculation and  was perceived by one team member as an issue of collaboration.
“Ironically our subject is called high collaboration so we should try to make it work…

Clearly it was originated due to time constraint of one member while turns into various different meanings to the audience.  This actually led to the first conflict of Team HARMONY.

Conflicts

The first conflict arose when team members missed agreed submission deadline. Followed up whatspp communication led to misunderstanding as described above. This appeared to be a PROCESS CONFLICT and we were trying to solve it through negotiating on timeline and decision making process.
The conversation was deviated when one team member complained that her effort and time she put into the project was ignored. The first reaction I had in mind was that I need to apologize if that was what she perceived since that topic is not what I REALLY WANT and it would create relationship conflict that would be dysfunctional. Later on when I went through the book “Crucial Conversations Tools”, I recalled this approach is important to make it safe for a dialogue. That may mean apologizing for certain wrong perceptions of the other parties since the goal is to get both parties back to the dialogue and not districted from the priority – what you REALLY want.

However the conflict was not solved until we met in class after Easter Holiday when the team members elaborated the conflict in more depth at the class exercise that it turned out to be a TASK CONFLICT.  Therefore in order to solve the conflict, it is critical to understand the root cause.


The True Conflict

During the week 11 class exercise, the professor asked us to share with the class the reflection of our team work through weather model.

The immediate group preference was giving a sunshine case since we are Team HARMONY. However this was a golden opportunity to bring up crucial conversation on the conflict we have had. As most of the time we avoided that discussion either through silence or changing of conversation topics, typical signs of conflicts in Asian Culture.  To be able to solve conflicts and initiate crucial conversations, we need learn to spot crucial conversation. So instead of discussing the sunshine model, we moved to the discussion of our then challenge and used the Fog model.
 We went in depth to dig the root cause and it turned out that we were not sharing the same understanding on what virtual organization means in our virtual project.  One team member was pursuing virtual project by laying out the detailed process as to her understanding the objective of the project is to show how virtual organization works. While another team member was after the benefits of the virtual organization that it would provide timely information sharing to save more lives. Another team member was assuming the difference was minor and a bit fine tune would fix it. We realized that the conflict is not the easy process conflict, it went beyond that and was more complicated as a TASK CONFLICT.

This crucial conversation became be the beginning to solve the task conflicts of the teams. After checking understanding with professor and alignment among team members, the Harmony team back to “Harmony” again with shared mutual understanding of the objective of the projects. Things moved on from there.
With that alignment on project objective, Team HARMONY assumed the effectiveness that presentation was prepared with less than half an hour and group blog was discussed with less than twenty minutes. Both cases demonstrated the importance to get aligned on the purpose of the project or any purpose of crucial conversation.

Prequel
Actually before the outburst of this conflict, I did have concern on the cancellation of the Saturday morning meeting prior to the Easter Holiday. Without that face to face meeting, we missed out the opportunity to align on the project objectives. If we did have that meeting, we might be able to solve the conflict way earlier instead of dragging for two to three weeks.


The reason why I did not voice out was because that I considered it was minor and I asked for commitment that each team member to submit her portion of power point to me instead by that Saturday. I was in hope that with receiving their works, I could follow up with them by phone in case any disconnect. This proved to lead to a slip in our project as it was by Sunday midnight that I received the portion from group members and I realized that we were not on the same page regarding the goal of our virtual rescue project.
 
Learning from this is that on one side we benefit from letting go small conflicts and on the other side small conflict can trigger serious conflict if not dealing properly. That would require the wisdom that we may not possess. Maybe only experience and time can tell.

Conclusion

To conclude, the interaction between morning team and evening has been very good as we seldom encounter conflicts with all the deliverables were met according to the timeline agreed. The evening team has provided guidance to the morning team while the morning team has followed the guidance and developed the ground works, especially the information gathering system and the incident commanding team, for the whole projects. With clear direction, clear roles and responsibilities and effective operating procedures, two virtual teams achieved high level collaboration.
 While within Team HARMONY, we have encountered a task conflict, partially deliberated set up to promote the deep learning of the subject. Based upon Jassawalla’s view on team building, attention must be paid on “At-Stakeness, Transparency, Mindfulness and Synergy” to achieve high levels of collaboration. The challenge Team HARMONY was facing is on the Transparency that a share understanding of the objective of our project – virtual organization was missing. 
The unspoken difference led to bottleneck of the project and with the trigger of disagreement on submission timeline, Team HARMONY went through a painful learning process of how to solve the conflict, from fog to sunshine per the weather report model. Just as what we brought up at the first blog of “Salary Negotiation”, enabling dialogue is important to crucial conversation. And having crucial conversation is an effective tool to solve conflicts.

Clearly the teams that worked virtually, Team TIE and Team HARMONY, actually had achieved higher level of collaboration. This supported the research that face to face meeting is not important on the effectiveness of virtual organization. The only fallback is that it was only until the end of semester that I realized I and Michelle, team member from Team TIE, had been at the same class every Thursday evening this whole semester.  J

Reference:

*    Kerry Patterson, Joseph Grenny, Ron McMillan, Al Switzler, Stephen R. Covey, 2002. Crucial Conversations: Tools for Talking When Stakes are High. McGraw-Hill


*      Eric Coggins. Virtual Organizations – Potential Advantages and Disadvantages. http://suite101.com/article/virtual-organizations--potential-advantages-and-disadvantages-a353182

*    Bjørn, P., & Ngwenyama, O. (2009). Virtual team collaboration: building shared meaning, resolving breakdowns and creating translucence. Information Systems Journal, 19(3), 227-253. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00281.x

*    Peters, L. M. L., & Manz, C. C. (2008). Getting Virtual Teams Right the First Time. In Nemiro, J., Beyerlein, M., Bradley, L., & Beyerlein, S. (2008). The Handbook of High-Performance Virtual Teams. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; pp. 105-129.

*    Avan Jassawalla and Avinash Malshe. (2010). “Effects of Transparency and At-stakeness on Students’ Perceptions of their Ability to Work Collaboratively in Effective Classroom Teams: A Partial Test of the Jassawalla & Sashittal Model.” Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 8 (1): 35-53.

*    M. Lynne Markus. Brook Manville & Carole E. Agres. (Fall 2000). What Makes a Virtual Organization Work? MIT SLOAN Management Review, Volume 42, 13-26.

*    Golnaz Sadri and John Condia. (Jan/Feb 2012. ) Managing the Virtual World. Industrial Management.

*    A. Lindgreen. Jvanhanime. (Fall 2002) Does Email Escalate Conflicts? MIT SLOANE Management Review

*    Time-Management-Guide.com. (2005). Virtual Team Benefits and Challenges. www.time-management-guide.com/virtual-team.hml