Natural disaster rescue has proven to be complicated and demanding since every minute counts and it is people’s lives that are at stake. Using the recent earthquake in Ya An, Si Chuan China that happened on 8:02 a.m 20th April as an example, there are many elements in the rescue process: Water, Food, Shelter, Army, Police, Volunteers, Charities, Government, Hospitals, First Aids, Medicines, Infrastructure, Transportation etc. Some of the elements are also interdependent, which add more complexity to the overall rescue process.
Positioning: Technology, especially virtual organization, should be integrated into the physical rescue process to save time and LIFE.
Concept: Through the virtual organization, natural disaster’s rescue demand would be able to match with supply and execution flawlessly and timely. Virtual dashboard would serve as the platform to enable the co-ordination of the various organizations virtually.
People: There are three categories of people involved: (1) The committee in charge – Incident Commanding Committee, (2) The members – corporates, organizations and charities and (3) The broader Audience – the public.
(2). Its members would include broader agents such as: army head, police head, fire service department head, companies that registered or interested in donating across the world, logistics companies, hospitals, Medicines Sans Frontiers, Red Cross, other charities and volunteers groups. They are the participants, either donators or commercial service providers.
(3). General Public would also have access to the dashboard with read access except the donation part. They can get the real time update on the rescue process without searching various reports or following up on various TV channels.
Operating System – the Virtual Dashboard
Virtual rescue dashboard is set up by IT specialist to co-ordinate the communication and information exchange between commanding team and its members. The Chief Commander has the ultimate right over the virtual dashboard and is in charge of the information flow and update. While members have read, write and edit access to the virtual dashboard to either donate or bid for the rescue activities. With the virtual dashboard served as a bridge between participants, information flow is now real time and transparent.
The Process
The Process
The effective process on execute fundamental materials to affected area is crucial. As such materials are critical to people who are in need and for survival purpose; for example, food, water, medication, rescue team, daily living supplies, etc. To illustrate this, a hypnosis of Maolin Taiwan earthquake was used to explain the process flow on (1) demand, (2) supply, (3) logistics and (4) execution.
(1) Demand. Team NOW would input and share the REAL TIME data on resources needed in each affected area through the Virtual Dashboard. The real time data would be gathered from government officers, rescue teams and volunteers of Red Cross, World Vision, local hospitals, Medicines Sans Frontiers, etc.
Dashboard is also open to resources that are not listed. For example, Company ABC is a cookie manufacturer who would like to donate power bar to Maolin. They will indicate on total number of power bar that they will donate into the system. And the Chief Commander can review the donation and approve it to be listed up to the dashboard. This would offer flexibility to companies who would like to participate and contribute. Once that is posted on the Virtual Dashboard, it is now at the hand of the logistic company to arrange delivery.
charity work or as a commercial activity. Same as the suppliers, each logistic company name will be showing in the system of virtual dashboard once got confirmed either as donator or commercial service provider.
Let us use the above power bar donation as an example. Logistics Company DEF will make arrangement for such power bar delivery together with other mentioned materials, if any, by fastest way to ship to Tai Wan International Airport or Air Force Base for consolidation. Once arrived at the airport or air force base, local logistic companies will work with the army and rescue teams to transfer those materials to Maolin.
(4) Execution. With the resources delivered, the rescue team together with the armies and police help, set for the rescue. They would then update any additional resource needed with the process of rescue as well as provide real time feedback to the incident commanding committees on the number of people rescued, sent to hospitals etc.
The virtual platform has many benefits which we would like to discuss in this section.
Benefit #1: Information Symmetry
Just as the class exercise we did that the group of demand forecast team and the group of supply providing team, without communicating, were coming up with set of resources unmatched between demand and supply. This is harmful in an emergency situation.
Like earthquake, everyone needs to source from the same platform using the same source of information to communicate and collaborate to avoid mismatch and confusion. This is a critical condition under which all relevant information is known to all parties involved simultaneously. It is the opposite of information asymmetry. Read more: http://www.investorwords.com /2463/information _symmetry. html#ixzz 2S8X JdWcU
enefits #3: Fast Track Results
This makes the contributors feel a sense of appreciation, encourages more participation and engages more donors, or contributors into the picture as help is being rallied over the platform. The system which allows tracking and inventorying creates a good track record for follow up and does prevent corruption in the event of collection and donation made.
Conclusions
In any of crisis management, especially dealing with natural disaster, contingency plan is critical. Just as the cases of the supply match that when no corporates signed up for the water delivery, the chief commander will launch the contingency plan to approach commercial bidders. Such contingency concept is crucial throughout the process as well as on the key personnel backing up. And TEAM HARMONY learned it the real way when coming up with the above project.
The journey of learning continues. Please do share with us your insights and comments!
Reference
Kerry Patterson, Joseph Grenny, Ron McMillan, Al Switzler, Stephen R. Covey, 2002. Crucial Conversations: Tools for Talking When Stakes are High. McGraw-Hill
Eric Coggins. Virtual Organizations – Potential Advantages and Disadvantages. http://suite101.com/article/virtual-organizations--potential-advantages-and-disadvantages-a353182
Bjørn, P., & Ngwenyama, O. (2009). Virtual team collaboration: building shared meaning, resolving breakdowns and creating translucence. Information Systems Journal, 19(3), 227-253. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00281.x
Peters, L. M. L., & Manz, C. C. (2008). Getting Virtual Teams Right the First Time. In Nemiro, J., Beyerlein, M., Bradley, L., & Beyerlein, S. (2008). The Handbook of High-Performance Virtual Teams. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; pp. 105-129.
Avan Jassawalla and Avinash Malshe. (2010). “Effects of Transparency and At-stakeness on Students’ Perceptions of their Ability to Work Collaboratively in Effective Classroom Teams: A Partial Test of the Jassawalla & Sashittal Model.” Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 8 (1): 35-53.
M. Lynne Markus. Brook Manville & Carole E. Agres. (Fall 2000). What Makes a Virtual Organization Work? MIT SLOAN Management Review, Volume 42, 13-26.
Golnaz Sadri and John Condia. (Jan/Feb 2012. ) Managing the Virtual World. Industrial Management.
A. Lindgreen. Jvanhanime. (Fall 2002) Does Email Escalate Conflicts? MIT SLOANE Management Review
Time-Management-Guide.com. (2005). Virtual Team Benefits and Challenges. www.time-management-guide.com/virtual-team.hml
No comments:
Post a Comment